Start Submission

Reading: A Review of the Recent Development of Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) Systems and Their Applicat...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Reviews

A Review of the Recent Development of Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) Systems and Their Applications

Authors:

Mayra Garcia Noxpanco ,

Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, GB
X close

James Wilkins,

Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, GB
X close

Saffa Riffat

Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, GB
X close

Abstract

Hybrid photovoltaic/thermal systems have become an important energy technology due to their capacity of producing electrical and thermal energy simultaneously, their ease of integration into buildings and good overall performance. Conventional PV systems generate waste energy in the form of heat during the conversion of solar radiation into electricity. It has been shown that the electrical efficiency of PV panels decays with the rise in the PV cell temperature. Therefore, PV performance can be optimised if this heat is removed. Air and water are the most common media used for heat removal and the energy can then be used for heating applications in buildings. In the last five decades, researchers worldwide have carried out experimental studies, simulations and numerical modelling of different types of PV/T systems. In addition to water and air, heat removal methods such as refrigerants, PCM, heat pumps and nanofluids have been analysed. This work presents an overview and discussion of the research of the different PV/T thermal control systems of the last five years. The present study highlights key points of the different techniques that exist, such as overall efficiencies, parameters and configurations, type of system, the nature of work, country of development and applications. Based on this study, it was concluded that the PV/T systems are auspicious technology and that further work should be focused on the aesthetics of the systems to promote acceptance and improvement of the efficiency.
How to Cite: Noxpanco, M.G., Wilkins, J. and Riffat, S., 2020. A Review of the Recent Development of Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) Systems and Their Applications. Future Cities and Environment, 6(1), p.9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/fce.97
39
Views
26
Downloads
1
Twitter
  Published on 12 Oct 2020
 Accepted on 28 Sep 2020            Submitted on 28 Jul 2020

1. Introduction

The reduction of global greenhouse gas (GHG) has been an important target for the last decades. This has led to an increased interest in alternative sources of energy that can meet future sustainability goals and protect our natural environment. A summary about the growth in global GHG made in 2018 by Olivier and Peters (2018), indicates that the emissions increased 1.3% in 2017 whereas the increase in 2015 and 2016 was only 0.2% and 0.6%, respectively. According to the same report, compared with 1990, today’s global greenhouse gas emissions are about 55% higher. This huge emission of GHG results from the energy demand. According to the International Energy Agency, buildings are responsible for 33% of the energy consumed worldwide and 28% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Around 77% of the global energy demand in buildings is due to the heating and cooling, including space heating and cooling, water heating and cooking (International Energy Agency, 2019).

To contribute to the reduction of emissions, some countries have committed to decrease the use of fuels by using instead more efficient technologies and renewable sources such as solar energy. Solar power can be used to generate electricity or thermal energy through photovoltaic modules or thermal collectors. These devices can be installed in buildings to help with the reduction of energy consumption, providing electricity, Domestic Hot Water (DHW) and heating spaces.

Solar photovoltaics (PV) is a power system which comprises a sequence of interconnected components that work together to convert sunlight energy into electricity, utilise the generated energy, store it, or invert it (Shubbak, 2019). This technology has been one of the pioneering renewable technologies over the decades. The total installed capacity of solar PV reached 480 GW globally by the end of 2018, representing the second-largest renewable electricity source after wind (IRENA, 2019).

Solar thermal collectors are designed specifically to collect heat by absorbing sunlight and may be used to heat air or water for building heating. The radiation from the sun heats a liquid that goes to a hot-water tank. The liquid heats the water and flows back to the solar collector. Solar collectors are considered to be one of the renewable energy technologies with the best economics. They have an estimated lifetime of 25 to 30 years or more and require very little maintenance except for control of antifreeze and pressure (Kubba, 2012). The literature has divided solar collectors into two types, stationary or non-concentrating and tracking or concentrating, the latter producing higher temperatures. A non-concentrating collector has the same area for intercepting and for absorbing solar radiation, whereas a sun-tracking concentrating solar collector usually has concave reflecting surfaces to intercept and focus the sun’s beam radiation to a smaller receiving area, thereby increasing the radiation flux (Gude, 2018).

Photovoltaic technology and thermal collectors can be combined in a single device called Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T), this device is formed by a PV module and a heat exchanger and it can generate both electricity and heat. Since the efficiency of a PV panel decreases when the temperature of the cell increases, removing heat from the photovoltaic module by having a fluid flowing through the collector avoids the loss of efficiency. Combining these technologies also alleviates building roof space issues that can occur with separate PV and thermal solar (Dean et al. 2015).

Even though both non-concentrated and concentrated collectors can be used to create a PV/T device, this paper is focused on providing an overview of non-concentrating PV/T systems due to their easier integration into buildings. However, recent studies made Singh and Tiwari (2017) and El-Samie et al. (2020) have been included.

Photovoltaic/thermal devices are an efficient way of utilizing the solar energy, for this reason, it has been a research topic since the late 1970s when researchers such as Kern and Russell (1978) and Florschuetz (1979) carried out investigations on flat plate PV/T collectors.

Authors such as Agrawal and Tiwari (2010), Bhattarai et al. (2012) and Adeli et al. (2012) analysed water-based and air-based PV/T systems at the beginning of the decade, being those conventional systems the most studied during the subsequent years. However, during the last five years, researchers have focused their work on several configurations of nanofluid, phase change materials (PCM) and heat pump PV/T systems.

Recent review papers written by Jia, Alva and Fang (2019), Diwania et al. (2020) and Rukman et al. (2019) include an overview of the different types of PV/T systems mentioned above, and despite some recent work is mentioned, all of them also mention experiments and simulations made on the previous decade. This review focuses on those last five years and intends to show other researchers the most recent development in this technology and what are the future contributions. In the following sections, a brief overview of the state-of-the-art of liquid-based, air-based, bi-fluid, refrigerant, heat pump, nanofluids, phase change materials and concentrated PV/T systems will be given.

2. Types of PV/T systems

Researchers have classified PV/T systems in different types throughout the years. This section reviews some of the most recent developments related to the PV/T collector with a focus on the application of building integration. The following PV/T systems are reviewed: air, water, bi-fluid, refrigerant, nanofluid, phase change materials, heat pump and concentrator type (Figure 1).

Figure 1 

Conventional and Novel types of PV/T.

2.1. Liquid-based systems

A liquid can be used to remove the heat in a PV/T system. The liquid is pumped through channels in the heat-collecting plate mounted on the back of the PV module. The heat generated from the PV is conducted through the plate and absorbed by the fluid, cooling the PV module. According to researchers such as Makki et al. (2015), this cools the PV, resulting in higher efficiency yet also creates a lower temperature variation on the surface of the PV module and therefore, a higher overall efficiency. Current research focuses on PV/T collectors cooled with water, bi-fluid and refrigerant.

2.1.1. Water cooling

After reviewing the different components and configurations of a water-based PV/T, Aste, del Pero and Leonforte (2014) reported that this media has a better efficiency due to the higher heat capacity of the water, allowing stable PV temperature control.

In most of the literature, researchers have performed a theoretical and experimental analysis of water-based PV/T systems. In most cases, the final use of the heated water is to fulfil domestic needs. These studies included configurations of PV/T with glazing, without glazing, semi-transparent PV modules, partially and fully covered by PV modules, and use of different types of coatings, etc.

The performance of an uncovered PV/T collector was investigated with the aim of a mathematical model simulated in TRNSYS by Aste et al. (2016). The PV/T consisted of an uncovered mc-Si PV module, bonded with a roll-bond aluminium absorber, a cylindrical storage tank, a loop for forced water circulation and a pump (Figure 2). The experiment was carried out over two years in Milan, Italy. The results showed that the system can have a thermal efficiency of around 15% and an electrical efficiency of 10%, approximately.

Figure 2 

Uncovered PV/T collector configuration (Aste et al. 2016).

Shyam et al. (2016) carried out experiments in New Delhi, India, using a PV/T water collector consisting of three single glazed tubes partially covered by semi-transparent PV modules. Some simulations were computed with MATLAB using different sky conditions. The results showed an annual overall thermal energy of 3561.9 kWh while the storage tank water could reach 80°C in a clear sky condition.

He et al. (2017) designed four experimental PV/T solar systems with PV cell coverage of 0.4, 0.56, 0.7, and 0.82. The influence of PV cell coverage on photothermal characteristics of a PV/T system was analysed, showing thermal efficiencies of 58%, 51%, 64%, and 67%, respectively, using 250 L of water to 50°C within 5 h (meeting local demand). It was concluded that by optimizing PV cell coverage, it is feasible to improve the thermal performance of the PV/T solar system.

Sainthiya and Beniwal (2019) experimentally investigated the effect of front surface water cooling on the performance of a PV/T module during summer and winter conditions in India. The electrical and thermal efficiencies of PV modules with and without water flow in both summer and winter seasons were calculated using energy balance equations. The required parameters were measured continuously at 1h intervals from 09:00 to 17:00 daily. It was shown that the difference between the analytical and experimental results was minor, agreeing that water flow on the front surface of the PV module significantly reduces the back-surface temperature. This improves electrical efficiency to 11–14% in winter and 9–12% in summer. The thermal efficiency was also enhanced by 22– 25% and 17–22% in winter and summer seasons, respectively.

After a CFD simulation using ANSYS, an experimental setup of a PV/T water system was analysed by Misha et al. (2019) under the weather conditions of Melaka, Malaysia. The PV/T system consisted of a PV panel connected to a dual oscillating absorber made of copper (Figure 3). The PV module was connected to a 100 L water tank which was connected to the inlet of the flat plate collector. The outlet from the collector was connected to the heat exchanger and the cold water sent to the storage tank. The cold water from the storage tank was then pumped into the flat plate collector. The results showed an average thermal efficiency of 59.6% and an electrical efficiency of 11.71%.

Figure 3 

Dual oscillating absorber designed by Misha et al. (2019).

When the contact area of the cooling channel with the PV module is small, the heat transfer effect is affected. For that reason, an iron scrap filled tube-plate PV/T system was studied by Ma et al. (2020). By using a filling medium, the heat exchange effect of the system was enhanced due to the increase of heat exchange between the backplane of the PV plate and the fluid inside the tube. The filling medium improves the thermal conductivity of the module and makes it useful as a building material. In this case, iron scraps were selected as a filling medium due to its cost, ability to incorporate metal resources and high thermal conductivity. For this experiment, a commercial monocrystalline module and the absorbing plate were bonded together with a layer of conductive cement. The heat collection module filled with iron scrap was placed underneath. Figure 4 shows the structure of the PV/T system and the iron scrap bed. The average electrical efficiency and thermal efficiency of the filled tube-plate was 15.5% and 65.7%, respectively.

Figure 4 

Cross section of the PV/T system and iron scrap filling (Ma et al. 2020).

2.1.2. Refrigerant cooling

Various studies have shown that using a refrigerant as the cooling fluid has the greatest improvements in the PV/T’s electrical efficiency. Despite this potential, recent research into the use of refrigerants has been limited due to its ozone depletion effects. The use of natural refrigerants such as CO2 or NH3 would be preferable as they are more environmentally sustainable.

Tsai (2015) studied a refrigerant-based photovoltaic/thermal assisted heat pump system under real conditions. The rig consisted of forty-eight solar panels arranged in two rows on a pre-coated steel support structure with of R134a refrigerant fluid in copper tubes adhered to a thermal absorber and polystyrene foam insulator, and a 200 L water tank. The experiment was conducted each day of June from 12:00 to 13:00. During this month, an average solar irradiance of almost 1 kW/m2 was reached. The PV output current was between 30 A and 37 A and the output power between 800 and 900 W. The water temperature reached 50°C at the end of the experiment.

2.1.3. Nanofluid cooling

Nanofluids are fluids containing nanometre-sized particles, known as nanoparticles. These nanofluids are typically made of metals, oxides, carbides, or carbon nanotubes. They exhibit enhanced thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer coefficients compared to the base fluid. Incorporating nanofluids in PV/T systems is an advanced method that provides improved thermal management, increasing the overall energy yield.

Rejeb et al. (2016) experimentally and numerically analysed the performance of a monocrystalline silicon PV unit shown in Figure 5, using nanoparticles of Al2O3 and Cu at different concentrations (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 wt%) and ethylene glycol and water as base fluids. The numerical model was developed using FORTRAN language with the experiments modelling weather conditions of Mashhad, Iran in late September from 9:30 to 15:30. It was noticed that the increase in the nanoparticles concentration leads to a degradation of the nanofluid specific heat. The results showed that CuO/H2O at 0.4 wt% has the best thermal performance (76.88%) and electrical efficiency of 13.5%.

Figure 5 

Experimental setup of the PV/T system studied by Rejeb et al. (2016).

Hamdan et al. (2017) experimentally investigated the improvement of the PV performance using nanofluids for temperature control. Three modules were investigated, one being a baseline, the second used water cooling while the third used nanofluids. The basic idea behind the use of nanofluids is that they will provide a higher heat extraction from the PV as they have better heat transfer properties than water, therefore, the photovoltaic cell will produce higher electricity because it is cooled more efficiently. Different concentrations of Al2O3 and CuO were used. The optimum concentration for cooling for Al2O3 and CuO was 0.4% and 0.6% respectively. The increase in electrical efficiency for water Al2O3 and CuO cooling were shown to be 11%, 20% and 23% respectively. The results confirmed that the use of nanofluids in the thermal management of a PV module will improve its electrical performance.

Samylingam et al. (2020) used COMSOL to numerically investigate the thermal performance of a PV/T system using MXene (Ti3C2) suspended in pure olein palm oil (OPO) as a heat transfer fluid. It was observed that this nanofluid improves the thermal efficiency, heat transfer performance and reduces the PV temperature. For the study, six different concentrations of MXene-OPO were used: 0.01, 0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.1 and 0.2 wt%. The results from the simulations showed that a concentration of 0.2 wt% with a flow rate of 0.07 kg/s has the highest thermal and electrical performance (79.13% and 13.8%, respectively) in the temperature range of 25–70°C. It was also observed that this concentration reduced the viscosity, resulting in a lower requirement of pumping power.

Rubbi et al. (2020) formulated a nanofluid from soybean oil (SO) and MXene (Ti3C2) particles. The numerical study was made in COMSOL using concentrations of 0.025, 0.075 and 0.125 wt%. During this study, it was observed that a concentration of 0.125 wt% of MXene-SO is better than the 0.2 wt% MXene-OPO studied by Samylingam et al. (2020). MXene-SO showed 12.11% increment in the heat removal performance compared to MXene-OPO. This was attributed to the better thermal conductivity of MXene nanoparticles as well as soybean oil in comparison to palm oil as a base fluid. It was concluded that thermal efficiency of 84.25% can be achieved at 0.07 kg/s mass flow rate, whereas the electrical efficiency obtained was 14.20% at the same flow rate (Figure 6).

Figure 6 

Performance evaluation of the thermal and electrical efficiency of a PV/T system studied by Rubbi et al. (2020).

2.2. Air-based systems

As its name suggests, air passes through an air-based PV/T system. This is done using the single or double pass and with an active or passive mode. Many researchers have worked with this type of collector, testing the efficiencies or optimising the design and configuration. As in the fluid-based PV/T systems, studies of air-based systems have been carried out using numerical models and simulations. Nowadays, these types of photovoltaic/thermal systems have thermal efficiencies of 32% to 34%, according to (Sathe and Dhoble, 2017).

A photovoltaic/thermal integrated greenhouse system for biogas heating was designed and evaluated by Tiwari et al. (2016) in climatic conditions of New Delhi, India in May. The system was formed by three glazed PV modules mounted on the roof of a single slope greenhouse, with two DC fans installed at the end of the duct (Figure 7). It was observed that the PV/T system can heat the greenhouse up to 47°C, a temperature that is good for biogas production. The thermal and overall thermal energy was 11.18 kWh and 12.76kWh, respectively, for a typical clear day. The electrical and thermal efficiencies reached 14.1% and 35.1%, respectively.

Figure 7 

Cross-sectional view of PV/T system integrated in a greenhouse (Tiwari et al. 2016).

Gholampour and Ameri (2016) numerically studied the heat transfer and flow of airflow of a PV/T flat transpired plate using a turbulent CFD model (in Fluent) and experimentally validated it under weather conditions of Kerman, Iran. The PV panel was mounted on a flat transpired plate with a small gap to allow air to flow (Figure 8). Two axial DC fans were used to draw air through the plate. The effect of different parameters such as location, suction air velocity, irradiance, ambient temperature and the PV coverage percentage was studied. The higher thermal efficiencies were achieved with a PV coverage between 45% and 55% with air velocities of 0.045 m/s and 0.06 m/s, yielding efficiencies between 75% and 80%.

Figure 8 

Schematic view of the experimental set up (Gholampour and Ameri 2016).

A comparative study between a photovoltaic module, a conventional air-based PV/T, a glazed air PV/T and a glazed double-pass PV/T collector was presented by Slimani et al. (2017). All of them with a monocrystalline PV module attached. These were tested using numerical models and were validated with experimental results from other authors. The researchers used an airflow rate of 0.023 kg/s and weather data from the city of Algiers, Algeria. The results showed that the glazed double-pass system has the best performance with an overall efficiency of 74%.

Jha, Das and Gupta (2019) experimentally analysed and compared the energy performance of a flat plate and wavy plate PV/T air collector. The collectors consisted of two single glazed PV/T mounted with 100 W polycrystalline PV module, positioned on the top of a rectangular air channel. A mathematical model was first developed and then validated with an experiment under the weather conditions of Silchar, India. The experiment was performed from 9:00 to 16:00 during five days of June, using six different airflow rates. The results confirmed that the use of a wavy plate will enhance the heat transfer in a PV/T air collector but will require a slightly higher fan power. The thermal and electrical efficiencies of the wave plate PV/T were 34% and 13.6%, respectively, and the enhance of exergy efficiency compared with the flat PV/T was 8.4%.

Arslan, Aktaş and Can (2020) experimentally and numerically investigated the performance of a finned air-based PV/T system in Ankara weather conditions. Firstly, the fin structure was modelled and analysed using ANSYS, then the PV/T collector was designed and built. To allow air to enter the collector, two channels were opened under it. Two AC fans were placed at the air outlet to allow the incoming air to be transported upwards (Figure 9). The experiments were carried out at two mass flow rates, 0.031 and 0.045 kg/s. The average thermal and electrical efficiencies at 0.031 kg/s were 37.10% and 13.56%, respectively and 49.5% and 13.98% at 0.045 kg/s.

Figure 9 

Experimental setup (Arslan, Aktaş and Can, 2020).

D. Kong et al. (2020) studied a solar hot-air drying system, looking to propose new solutions for the agriculture. The system was formed by two types of PV cells to test the performance of two PV/T systems; amorphous silicon thin-film and polycrystalline silicon. Both systems were connected to the same inlet air and were composed of the same elements; glass cover, absorber plate, insulation layer and air channel with fins. The hot air coming from the collector was sent into the drying chamber where 12 DC fans were placed to strengthen the hot air movement and to eliminate the stagnant hot airflow zones whilst maintaining uniform humidity and temperature in the chamber (Figure 10). The average thermal efficiency of the amorphous silicon and the polycrystalline PV/T system was 48.9% and 42.9%, respectively. The average electrical efficiency achieved 10.4% on the amorphous silicon and 12% on the polycrystalline panel.

Figure 10 

Schematic diagram of the drying system proposed by D. Kong et al. (2020).

2.3. Bi-fluid systems

Only a few researchers have studied PV/T systems with two fluids. Water and air have been used in those types of systems to provide hot air, hot water and electricity at the same time. As previously mentioned, this type of system combines water and air heat exchangers and have low operating costs and minimal use of material but have a reduced thermal to electrical conversion efficiency (Sathe and Dhoble, 2017).

Othman et al. (2016) fabricated a system formed by two transparent PV modules connected in parallel, double pass flat plate air collector, copper water tube and a storage tank (Figure 11). The experiment was conducted under solar irradiance from 350 W/m2–800 W/m2 and fluid mass flow rate from 0.01 kg/s–0.10 kg/s. The numerical results showed that the electrical efficiency can reach 17% and the thermal efficiency can reach 76% with an average outlet temperature of 27.4°C when having a solar intensity of 800 W/m2. Those efficiencies were achieved when having an air mass flow rate of 0.05 kg/s and 0.02 kg/s water mass flow rate.

Figure 11 

Structure of the combined PV/T system studied by Othman et al. (2016).

Another 2D steady-state analysis was developed by Jarimi et al. (2016) using MATLAB and a solar simulator. As in Abu Bakar et al. (2014), three modes of operation were tested: air mode, water mode and simultaneous mode. The simultaneous mode was divided into two sub-modes: fixed air flow rate and fixed water flow rate and they were tested under average solar radiation of 700 W/m2. It was observed that when one of the fluids flow rate increases, the efficiency of the other fluid decreases. It was also observed that the simultaneous use of the fluids compensates one another in extracting the unwanted heat from the collector into useful energy. When the airflow rate was fixed at 0.0262 kg/s the total thermal efficiency was around 65.70% and when the water flow rate was fixed, the thermal efficiency was around 66.12%.

Su et al. (2016) studied the performance of a PV/T solar collector with dual channels for different fluids. The configurations used were water-air, air-water, air-air and water-water and can be observed in Figure 12. To test the system, the weather condition of Nanjing, China on a summer day was used and the wind speed was assumed to be stable. It was observed that the cell temperature varies from 29.7°C to 46.3°C when using the water-water mode and varies from 32°C to 112°C when using the air-air mode with the conclusion that the water-water mode can extract more heat than the air-air, where the water-water mode had a higher electrical efficiency (7.8%). Regarding the thermal efficiency, the water-water mode reached 64.4% so it was concluded that the water-water mode is the best in both electrical and thermal performance. This operation mode reached an overall efficiency of 84.2% when the mass flow rate of water is 0.15 kg/s.

Figure 12 

Configurations of a PV/T collector with dual channels (Su et al. 2016).

A self-cleaning PV/T bi-fluid system was experimentally analysed by Lebbi et al. (2020) under the climatic conditions of Ghardaïa, Algeria. The rig was formed by an aluminium flat plate, two DC fans connected to the outlet to extract the hot air and a perforated plastic tube with 16 nozzles at the top edge of the module to ensure active cooling and self-cleaning, this can be observed in Figure 13. The results showed that the system can reach an electrical efficiency of 13.17% when the irradiance is 650 W/m2 and average thermal efficiency of 50%.

Figure 13 

Setup of the PV/T system designed by Lebbi et al. (2020).

2.4. PV/T Integrated Systems

2.4.1. Heat Pump

In these systems, the heat produced from the PV/T is fed into the heat pump evaporator. The process is outlined: (1) direct expansion of the refrigerant from liquid to vapour, taking place inside the hydraulic circuit of the PV panels, (2) vapour compression for heating purposes, (3) refrigerant is condensed for heat transfer to water, (4) expansion valve (or capillary tube) used to turn high-pressure refrigerant to low-pressure liquid for reinsertion into PV/T evaporator (Riaz et al., 2020). Although this system is more complex than a conventional liquid cooling system, it provides a greater heat transfer from the PV to the working fluid than the prementioned systems, allowing for greater thermal and electrical efficiencies.

Zhou, Ma, et al. (2020) developed a numerical simulation and experimental validation for a microchannel PV/T module integrated with a direct-expansion solar heat pump system. The schematic for the solar-driven heat pump system shown in Figure 14 comprises of 11 micro-channel PV/T modules (evaporator), a compressor, a heat storage tank (condenser) and an electric expansion valve. The heat storage tank was connected to the heat exchanger located inside the building, providing space heating. The numerical simulation model contains individual energy balance calculations of each of these components and was carried out using real weather information. The experimental average electrical, thermal and overall efficiencies of the PV/T module were 13.1%, 56.6% and 69.7% respectively which were validated by the simulation results. It was further shown that the solar heat pump system could provide adequate space heating for a 150 m2 space in real-world conditions.

Figure 14 

Solar assisted direct-expansion heat pump system employing the novel PV/mini-channels -evaporator modules (Zhou, Ma, et al. 2020).

Zhou, Zhu, et al. (2020) experimentally and theoretically investigated novel solar-assisted indirect-expansion heat pump system integrated with a novel channel PV/T collector intended for space heating under typical conditions for winter in Lvliang, China. The PV/T collector consisted of a glass cover, PV cell layer, absorber, mini-channel heat exchanger, air vent, insulation layer and frame. An air gap between the glass cover and the absorber was added to remove the need for an air vent behind the heat exchanger. The experimental testing was carried out for more than seven days and one typical day’s data was used as input parameters. The results showed a discrepancy between simulated and experimental data ranged from 4.0% to 9.1%. Table 1 shows the results obtained from both studies.

Table 1

Efficiencies obtained by Zhou, Zhu et al. 2020.

Experimental Simulation

Electrical efficiency 14.6% 15.8%
Thermal efficiency 39.3% 42.2%
Overall efficiency 53.9% 58%
COPHP 4.9 4.6

The simulation model is verified by the experimental result – is a reasonable method for predicting the seasonal performance of the system in future.

Koşan et al. (2020) designed and tested a PV/T assisted heat pump drying system and compared it with a PV panel. To set up the experiment, two 100W PV panels were used. The rear surface of one of them was equipped with copper pipes to create the PV/T system, using refrigerant R134a as a cooling medium. This system was then connected to a heat pump unit and a drying chamber. The experiments to test the cooling of the PV were carried out under summer weather conditions to enhance electrical performance. The testing of the drying chamber was carried out in the autumn to evaluate the heat obtained from the heat pump. The average electrical efficiency and the average thermal efficiency were 12.27% and 53.66%, respectively. It was also observed that the thermal efficiency of PV panels cooled by refrigerant is higher than other fluids.

A PV/T cascade heat pump was numerically studied under the tropical weather conditions of Chiang Mai, Thailand by R. Kong et al. (2020). The cascade heat pump is a combination of low-temperature cycle and high-temperature cycle, having R134a and R245fa refrigerants as working fluids. During the PV/T heat pump operation, part of the cool water is used to cool down the module temperature. This can enhance the electrical performance of the system. The researchers used Microsoft Excel and MATLAB to carry out the simulations. The total operation time of the heat pump was 10 hours per day throughout a year. The results showed that the system is capable of producing hot water up to 90°C and cold water between 12 and 18°C.

The performance of a heat pump water system coupled with an air-based PV/T system was experimentally investigated by Choi et al. (2020). The collector was formed by two important parts: the PV module and the air channel composed of an aluminium duct, insulator and transverse triangular obstacle to improving the heat transfer performance from the PV module to flowing air (Figure 15). A heat pump with a single-stage compression cycle was added to the rig. The evaporator was a fin and tube heat exchanger, capable of retrieving thermal energy from an air source, and the condenser was a plate type heat exchanger, which produced hot water. The experiments were carried out on a clear day of October in Busan, South Korea. The results showed that the average values of power generation and electrical efficiency in the PV/T system were 144.23 W/m2 and 16.61%. The thermal efficiency varied from 26.04% to 33.23%, with an average value of 30.28%.

Figure 15 

Schematic view of the air-based PV/T analysed by Choi et al. (2020).

2.4.2. Phase Change Materials

Phase Change Materials (PCM) are those which change the phase from solid to liquid within the design temperature range, absorbing or releasing heat/energy. During this heat absorption, phase change materials temperature remains constant (Hall, 2010). Researchers have used PCM in solar cells, preserving its temperature close to the ambient temperature and so, improving efficiency.

Gaur et al. (2017) developed a mathematical model for a water-based un-glazed PV/T collector with and without PCM under the absorber channel (Figure 16). They carried out the investigations using PCM OM37 for a typical winter and summer day in Lyon, France. It was observed that during the night, PCM heats the collector water, providing hot water in the next morning. The results of the study showed that the electrical efficiency for a typical summer day is 16.3% and 26.87% on a winter day. The overall thermal energy for a summer day is 14.14 kWh and 13.18 kWh for a winter day. These results were compared with the performance of the system without PCM and it was concluded that the performance is better when using phase change materials.

Figure 16 

Schematic diagram of the unglazed PV/T system with PCM (Gaur et al. 2017).

A water-based photovoltaic/thermal system with paraffin wax RT-30 as phase change material was studied by Preet et al. (2017) in Gurdaspur, India. To increase the heat storage capacity of the PCM, copper pipes were inserted within it and water flowed through them to extract heat of the phase change material, nine fins were also integrated to increase the heat transfer rate (Figure 17). It was observed that, when using a mass flow rate of 0.013 kg/s, the system has a reduction of 49.8% in the temperature compared with the average solar radiation and a reduction of 51.4% with a mass flow rate of 0.023 kg/s. It was also observed that the electrical efficiency of a PV/T – PCM system is around 190% higher compared with a conventional PV panel. Regarding the thermal efficiency, the PV/T-PCM system showed a lower performance compared with a conventional PV/T, 15.96% and 33.81%, respectively. This is due to the rise in temperature of water in the PV/T system is higher as compared to PV/T-PCM system at the same solar intensity.

Figure 17 

Diagram of PV/T – PCM system studied by (Preet et al. 2017).

Li et al. (2019) experimentally investigated the performance of a PV/T module with phase change material and compared it with a PV-only and a PV-PCM system. The collector consisted of a 100Wp crystalline PV panel attached to a PCM container without using the typical contact layer and then attached to a 40L water tank. Technical grade paraffin wax was selected as the PCM for this study, this due to its excellent energy storage capacity. The experiment was run under the weather conditions of Shanghai, China during July. The results showed that the PV/T-PCM system could produce output water of 41.6°C during the day. The exergy improvement compared with the PV-PCM was 30.4% and the overall exergetic energy increased by 8.32%.

Das et al. (2020) developed a transparent multi-crystalline PV module with rectangular spiral absorber tubes directly glued to the PV backside. A 10mm layer of PCM (OM35) and biochar derived from water hyacinth was used as cooling media (Figure 18). The PCM-biochar composite material was manufactured by impregnation. Six different mass ratios of PCM and biochar were selected to optimise, which would give better results in terms of stability, leakage test and conductivity. The performance parameters of the PV/T module were calculated under a constant flow rate of 0.015 kg/s. The experiment was performed from 10:00 to 16:00 h, and data were recorded every 30 minutes. The calculated average thermal efficiency was 73.5% and the electrical efficiency varied between 11.3% and 13.47%, being 13.1% the average value.

Figure 18 

Rectangular spiral absorber and PCM-hyacinth biochar composite, Das et al. (2020).

Akshayveer et al. (2020) developed and validated a PV/T- PCM system using the weather conditions of Varanasi, India. Two numerical models were created to study the performance of the PV panel when the airflow channel is attached above it and PCM adhered beneath the panel. A PV panel, PV-PCM and PV/T-PCM system were compared and it was observed that PCM reduces the PV temperature up to 73.97°C and attaching a natural air-flow channel on top reduced the temperature up to 63.24°C. This helped to increase the electrical efficiency from 8.85% (PV panel) to 10.6% (PV/T- PCM). The outlet temperature of air reached 42.52°C with a mass flux of 8.25 kg/s.

2.5. Concentrated PV/T Systems

These systems concentrate solar radiation onto a PV receiver using reflectors. CPV/Ts can often reach solar concentrations equivalent to 100 suns and require more complex components which include dual-axis tracking and multi-junction PV cells. A cooling fluid is generally circulated between the PV receivers and a heat exchanger in a closed loop. Providing there is a high demand for heat overall CPV/T efficiencies can operate up to 80%, gathered as electricity and heat. PV/T collectors are advantageous due to the use of a reflector material, which is less expensive than PV panels, hence expensive PV panels can be replaced by less expensive reflector material reducing the overall cost of the system. The drawbacks are that stable cooling is necessary because of the high temperatures which can damage PV cells. Some CPV/T designs include an additional power generation cycle, such as Rankine, utilising the additional thermal energy.

Singh and Tiwari (2017) studied the performance of basin type solar stills integrated with N identical partially covered CPV/T system depending on the effect of water depth. Solar distillation is the process of getting potable water from saline water using thermal energy. Figure 19 shows the schematic diagram of the system. It can be observed that the N identical CPC water collectors are partially covered (25%) with PV/T. The single slope active solar still had a basin area of 2 m × 1 m made of glass-reinforced plastic with a transparent glass cover. The inner surfaces were painted in black to maximise the absorption of solar flux. It was concluded that the optimum mass flow rate is 0.04 m/s and the optimum water depth of the single-slope basin is 0.70 m and 0.31 m for a double slope basin.

Figure 19 

Diagram of a single slope active solar still partially covered by CPV/T (Singh and Tiwari 2017).

El-Samie et al. (2020) modelled the optical, thermal and electrical performance of the low CPV/T collector using finite volume CFD and was validated by the Monte Carlo ray-tracing method. The authors investigated different heat sink designs (U-type & Z-type) & coolants (water, ethylene glycol, and Therminol VP-1). It was found that variations of irradiance greatly influence the electric performance, while high thermal efficiency of about 48 to 51% can be achieved throughout the day. Z type heat sink found to reduce the PV cell temperature more than U-type. The water-cooling system achieved the highest efficiencies with an average thermal efficiency of 48.8% and an average electrical efficiency of 7.1%.

3. Conclusions

According to the literature cited in this work, the following summary has been provided. It is likely for the researchers to carry out studies on water-based and air-based PV/T systems due to their performance and easier integration into buildings. It was also observed that most of the studies have been developed using flat-plate PV/T collectors. However, during the last years, several researchers have focused their work on novelty technologies such as PCM and nanofluids. Air-based PV/T systems have a better performance when they have more than one entry and they are suitable for space heating in cold climates. Partially covered systems have higher thermal performance but lower electrical performance. Most of the simulations were made using software like MATLAB, ANSYS and TRNSYS and using 2D steady-state heat transfer models. In bi-fluid systems, when the mass flow rate of a fluid increases and the other parameters remain stable, one of the thermal or electrical efficiency decreases. It was also observed that these systems can reach thermal efficiencies up to 76% and electrical efficiencies up to 17%, which is the case of the experiments carried out by Jarimi et al. (2016). The experiment carried out by Choi et al. (2020) showed that the use of a heat pump can significantly enhance the electrical performance of a PV/T system, however, the thermal performance is one of the lowest. The same was observed in some of the PCM based systems. The highest thermal efficiencies were achieved when using nanofluids as cooling media, confirming that this novelty technology is worth studying and applying. The electrical and thermal efficiencies of concentrated PV/T systems are high (between 7.1% and 10.02% and 48%–60%, respectively), but the installation requires a lot of space and so they are difficult to integrate into small buildings such as residencies but can be suitable for other applications such as solar distillation. Table 2 below shows a summary of all the review papers quoted in this work. The type of system and its electrical efficiency, thermal efficiency, origin, author and year are specified.

Table 2

Summary of the recent work on PV/T systems.

Author Type Year Electrical efficiency Thermal efficiency Origin

Aste et al. (2016) Water-based 2016 10 15 Italy
Shyam et al. (2016) Water-based 2016 5 to 6 India
He, Xiao and Li (2017) Water-based 2017 51 to 67 China
Sainthiya and Beniwal (2019) Water-based 2019 11 to 14 22 to 25 India
Misha et al. (2019) Water-based 2020 11.71 59.6 Malaysia
Ma et al. (2020) Water-based 2020 15.5 65.7 China
Tsai (2015) Refrigerant 2015 Taiwan
Rejeb et al. (2016) Nanofluid 2016 13.5 76.88 Iran
Hamdan and Kardasi (2017) Nanofluid 2017 12.06 Jordan
Samylingam et al. (2020) Nanofluid 2020 13.8 79.13 Malaysia
Rubbi et al. (2020) Nanofluid 2020 14.20 84.25 Malaysia
Tiwari et al. (2016) Air-based 2016 India
Gholampour and Ameri (2016) Air-based 2016 45 to 55 Iran
Slimani et al. (2017) Air-based 2017 10.65 44 Algeria
Jha, Das and Gupta (2019) Air-based 2019 13.6 34 India
Arslan, Aktaş and Can (2020) Air-based 2020 13.98 49.5 Turkey
D. Kong et al. (2020) Air-based 2020 12 48.9 China
Othman et al. (2016) Bi-fluid 2016 17 76 Malaysia
Jarimi et al. (2016) Bi-fluid 2016 66.12 Malaysia
Su et al. (2016) Bi-fluid 2016 7.8 China
Lebbi et al. (2020) Bi-fluid 2020 13.17 50 Algeria
Zhou, Ma, et al. (2020) Heat Pump 2020 13.1 56.6 China
Zhou, Zhu, et al. (2020) Heat Pump 2020 14.6 to 15.8 39.3 to 42.2 China
Koşan et al. (2020) Heat Pump 2020 12.27 53.66 Turkey
R. Kong et al. (2020) Heat Pump 2020 Thailand
Choi et al. (2020) Heat Pump 2020 16.61 30.28 South Korea
Gaur et al. (2017) PCM 2017 16.3 26.87 France
Preet et al. (2017) PCM 2017 15.96 33.81 India
Li et al. (2019) PCM 2019 China
Das et al. (2020) PCM 2020 13.1 73.5 India
Akshayveer et al. (2020) PCM 2020 10.6 India
Singh and Tiwari (2017) CPV/T 2017 60 India
El-Samie et al. (2020) CPV/T 2020 7.1 48.8 China

4. Gaps and challenges

Finally, it is important to notice that there is room for improvement regarding the Building Integrated PV/T systems. Several authors have studied PV/T integrated into buildings, but these systems keep being inaesthetic and hence, not attractive to the users. Those systems also stay as experimental rigs or can only be roof-mounted, so, without a proper design, it is difficult to expand the PV/T market. For this reason, it is recommended to carry out more studies on these systems and not only to improve the aesthetic but to optimise the configuration and then increase the efficiencies. Also, the next phase of research should investigate the changes to heat transfer through the external envelope and how this will affect the building space heating and cooling loads. Another gap in this research area is the economic evaluation, it is difficult to find information about the cost of a PV/T system so it is suggested to provide such information soon and make it accessible not only to other researchers but to designers, architects and engineers.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Science and Technology Council of Mexico (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, CONACYT).

Competing Interests

Saffa Riffat is the Editor in Chief of the journal and was completely removed from all editorial processing for this paper.

References

  1. Adeli, M, et al. 2012. ‘Experimental Performance Evaluation of a Photovoltaic Thermal (PV/T) Air Collector and Its Optimization’. Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 58: 309–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2010.007 

  2. Agrawal, B and Tiwari, GN. 2010. ‘Optimizing the energy and exergy of building integrated photovoltaic thermal (BIPVT) systems under cold climatic conditions’. Applied Energy, 87(2): 417–426. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.011 

  3. Akshayveer, et al. 2020. ‘Effect of natural convection and thermal storage system on the electrical and thermal performance of a hybrid PV-T/PCM systems’. Materials Today: Proceedings. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.010 

  4. Arslan, E, Aktaş, M and Can, ÖF. 2020. ‘Experimental and numerical investigation of a novel photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) collector with the energy and exergy analysis’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276: 123255. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123255 

  5. Aste, N, et al. 2016. ‘Performance monitoring and modeling of an uncovered photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) water collector’. Solar Energy, 135: 551–568. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.029 

  6. Aste, N, del Pero, C and Leonforte, F. 2014. ‘Water flat plate PV–thermal collectors: A review’. Solar Energy, 102: 98–115. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.025 

  7. Bhattarai, S, et al. 2012. ‘Simulation and model validation of sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system and conventional solar collecting system in transient states’. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 103: 184–193. North-Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.04.017 

  8. Choi, HU, et al. 2020. ‘Experimental study on the performance of heat pump water heating system coupled with air type PV/T collector’. Applied Thermal Engineering, 178: 115427. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115427 

  9. Das, D, et al. 2020. ‘Performance investigation of a rectangular spiral flow PV/T collector with a novel form-stable composite material’. Applied Thermal Engineering. Pergamon. p. 116035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116035 

  10. Dean, J, et al. 2015. Photovoltaic-Thermal New Technology Demonstration, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63474.pdf (Accessed: 6 March 2019). 

  11. Diwania, S, et al. 2020. ‘Photovoltaic–thermal (PV/T) technology: a comprehensive review on applications and its advancement’. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 11(1): 33–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-00327-y 

  12. El-Samie, MMA, et al. 2020. ‘Three-dimensional numerical investigation of a hybrid low concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system’. Energy, 190: 116436. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116436 

  13. Florschuetz, LW. 1979. ‘Extension of the Hottel-Whillier model to the analysis of combined photovoltaic/thermal flat plate collectors’. Solar Energy, 22(4): 361–366. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(79)90190-7 

  14. Gaur, A, Ménézo, C and Giroux—Julien, S. 2017. ‘Numerical studies on thermal and electrical performance of a fully wetted absorber PVT collector with PCM as a storage medium’. Renewable Energy, 109: 168–187. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.062 

  15. Gholampour, M and Ameri, M. 2016. ‘Energy and exergy analyses of Photovoltaic/Thermal flat transpired collectors: Experimental and theoretical study’. Applied Energy, 164: 837–856. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.042 

  16. Gude, 2018. 2018. Renewable Energy Powered Desalination Handbook: Application and Thermody-namics, Renewable Energy Powered Desalination Handbook: Application and Thermodynamics. Elsevier Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-02851-3 

  17. Hall, MR. 2010. Materials for energy efficiency and thermal comfort in buildings. CRC Press. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781845695262/materials-for-energy-efficiency-and-thermal-comfort-in-buildings (Accessed: 14 March 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699277 

  18. Hamdan, MA and Kardasi, KK. 2017. ‘Improvement of Photovoltaic Panel Efficiency using Nanofluid’. Int. J. of Thermal & Environmental Engineering, 14(2): 143–151. 

  19. He, Y, Xiao, L and Li, L. 2017. ‘Research on the influence of PV cell to thermal characteristics of photovoltaic/thermal solar system’. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(9): 1287–1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3711 

  20. International Energy Agency. 2019. ‘World Energy Balances 2019.’ World Energy Balances Overview, pp. 1–23. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/8bd626f1-a403-4b14-964f-f8d0f61e0677/World_Energy_Balances_2019_Overview.pdf. 

  21. IRENA. 2019. Future of Wind: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Available at: https://www.irena.org/documentdownloads/publications/re_technologies_cost_analysis-hydropower.pdf (Accessed: 23 September 2020). 

  22. Jarimi, H, et al. 2016. ‘Bi-fluid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) solar collector: Experimental validation of a 2-D theoretical model’. Renewable Energy, 85: 1052–1067. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.014 

  23. Jha, P, Das, B and Gupta, R. 2019. ‘An experimental study of a photovoltaic thermal air collector (PVTAC): A comparison of a flat and the wavy collector’. Applied Thermal Engineering, 163: 114344. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114344 

  24. Jia, Y, Alva, G and Fang, G. 2019. ‘Development and applications of photovoltaic–thermal systems: A review’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 102: 249–265. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.030 

  25. Kern, ECJ and Russell, MC. 1978. Hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar energy system. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/7151726 

  26. Kong, D, et al. 2020. ‘Experimental study of solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) air collector drying performance’. Solar Energy, 208: 978–989. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.067 

  27. Kong, R, et al. 2020. ‘Performance and economic evaluation of a photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T)-cascade heat pump for combined cooling, heat and power in tropical climate area’. Journal of Energy Storage, 30. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101507 

  28. Koşan, M, et al. 2020. ‘Performance analyses of sustainable PV/T assisted heat pump drying system’. Solar Energy, 199: 657–672. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.040 

  29. Kubba, S. 2012. Handbook of Green Building Design, and Construction, Handbook of Green Building Design, and Construction. Elsevier Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-64483-4 

  30. Lebbi, M, et al. 2020. ‘Energy performance improvement of a new hybrid PV/T Bi-fluid system using active cooling and self-cleaning: Experimental study’. Applied Thermal Engineering. Pergamon, p. 116033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116033 

  31. Li, Z, et al. 2019. ‘Experimental study and performance analysis on solar photovoltaic panel integrated with phase change material’. Energy, 178: 471–486. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.166 

  32. Ma, X, et al. 2020. ‘Performance investigation of an iron scrap filled tube-plate PV/T system’. Energy for Sustainable Development, 58: 196–208. Elsevier B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.08.002 

  33. Makki, A, Omer, S and Sabir, H. 2015. ‘Advancements in hybrid photovoltaic systems for enhanced solar cells performance’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 658–684. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.069 

  34. Misha, S, et al. 2019. ‘Simulation CFD and experimental investigation of PVT water system under natural Malaysian weather conditions’. Energy Reports. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.162 

  35. Olivier, J and Peters, J 2018. Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions 2018 report. Available at: www.pbl.nl/en. (Accessed: 4 March 2019). 

  36. Othman, MY, et al. 2016. ‘Performance analysis of PV/T Combi with water and air heating system: An experimental study’. Renewable Energy, 86: 716–722. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.061 

  37. Preet, S, Bhushan, B and Mahajan, T. 2017. ‘Experimental investigation of water based photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system with and without phase change material (PCM)’. Solar Energy, 155: 1104–1120. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.040 

  38. Rejeb, O, et al. 2016. ‘Numerical and model validation of uncovered nanofluid sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system’. Energy Conversion and Management, 110: 367–377. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.063 

  39. Riaz, A, et al. 2020. ‘A review on the application of photovoltaic thermal systems for building façades’. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 41(1): 86–107. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624419845117 

  40. Rubbi, F, et al. 2020. ‘Performance optimization of a hybrid PV/T solar system using Soybean oil/MXene nanofluids as A new class of heat transfer fluids’. Solar Energy, 208: 124–138. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.060 

  41. Rukman, NSB, et al. 2019. ‘Electrical and thermal efficiency of air-based photovoltaic thermal (PVT) systems: An overview’. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 14(3): 1134–1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v14.i3.pp1134-1140 

  42. Sainthiya, H and Beniwal, NS. 2019. ‘Efficiency Enhancement of Photovoltaic/Thermal Module Using Front Surface Cooling Technique in Winter and Summer Seasons: An Experimental Investigation’. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME, 141(9): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043133 

  43. Samylingam, L, et al. 2020. ‘Thermal and energy performance improvement of hybrid PV/T system by using olein palm oil with MXene as a new class of heat transfer fluid’. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 218: 110754. Elsevier B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110754 

  44. Sathe, TM and Dhoble, AS. 2017. ‘A review on recent advancements in photovoltaic thermal techniques’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76: 645–672. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.075 

  45. Shubbak, MH. 2019. ‘Advances in solar photovoltaics: Technology review and patent trends’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd. p. 109383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109383 

  46. Shyam, et al. 2016. ‘Performance evaluation of N-photovoltaic thermal (PVT) water collectors partially covered by photovoltaic module connected in series: An experimental study’. Solar Energy, 134: 302–313. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.05.013 

  47. Singh, DB and Tiwari, GN. 2017. ‘Performance analysis of basin type solar stills integrated with N identical photovoltaic thermal (PVT) compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) collectors: A comparative study’. Solar Energy, 142: 144–158. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.047 

  48. Slimani, MEA, et al. 2017. ‘A detailed thermal-electrical model of three photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) hybrid air collectors and photovoltaic (PV) module: Comparative study under Algiers climatic conditions’. Energy Conversion and Management, 133: 458–476. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.066 

  49. Su, D, et al. 2016. ‘Dynamic performance analysis of photovoltaic–thermal solar collector with dual chan-nels for different fluids’. Energy Conversion and Management, 120: 13–24. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.095 

  50. Tiwari, S, et al. 2016. ‘Thermal modelling of photovoltaic thermal (PVT) integrated greenhouse system for biogas heating’. Solar Energy, 136: 639–649. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.07.048 

  51. Tsai, HL. 2015. ‘Modeling and validation of refrigerant-based PVT-assisted heat pump water heating (PVTA-HPWH) system’. Solar Energy, 122: 36–47. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.08.024 

  52. Zhou, J, Ma, X, et al. 2020. ‘Numerical simulation and experimental validation of a micro-channel PV/T modules based direct-expansion solar heat pump system’. Renewable Energy, 145: 1992–2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.049 

  53. Zhou, J, Zhu, Z, et al. 2020. ‘Theoretical and experimental study of a novel solar indirect-expansion heat pump system employing mini channel PV/T and thermal panels’. Renewable Energy, 151: 674–686. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.054